Skip to main content

How Encryption Annoyed Me Today

I am currently making an app to research experience. I am very toward the end of making the first version, which will go into the testing. I expect a lot of things to go wrong. This is going to be a very new experience for me.

Well, one of the things that went wrong with the previous version a couple of years ago was, that the whole experience data was collected in plain text on the server. Where it would be a easy target for hackers to get. Maybe this was alright in 2015 (at least that is how it was presented to me), but since then we had the whole Cambridge Analytica and their involvement in Trump election and Brexit vote, so not something that we want to deal with in 2019.

They have the whole strategy, how they are going to protect the privacy of the people now. The problem is, that their part is not ready yet. So until it will be ready, the data would be send by email. Not exactly a good alternative. Unless the data would be encrypted.

So in the recent days I got the idea. Why not use some kind of public-private keys for encryption. This should work. So I went, realized that a lot of people talk abut the RSA and decided to try and implement this in the app.

Almost a whole day later, I finally got the app to send the encrypted file this way. The problem was, that the content of the file was too big to be able to decrypt it. Apparently there is a size limit, based on how long the key is? Well, since these things can go quite large, this was almost a whole day spend on the way that would not work.

So we are back on the AES encryption and researchers and the participants in research exchanging the passwords in person. Quite more work. The other alternative would be to encrypt the key with public key, but this one I was not sure, if I am capable enough to explain in order for them to understand. Since it is a short-term solution, I guess it would work. And I hope whatever solution they will come with, it will not take too long.

Well, as long they are not like some people that I know, who are sending their passwords to other people in Facebook messenger. Yes, I have seen this happen in person.

But the lesson for today way, RSA can only be used for short messages. Good to know for next time.

My Quick Drawnings 2019-01-10

When I was listening to my lingustics lessons, I relized that a lot of what the guess lecturer was talking about, I still remember from the neurology classes. So I started to draw, in order to help me with the concetration. These are the pictures that I made because of this.

the picture of house on the hill

For this picture I tried to recreate a picture that I did on one of my drawning lessons. Well, at least I can say, that that one was better. But then again, I needed more than 2 hours for that one, and I spend 15 minutes on this one.

the picture of a dice

Here, I was trying to pratice the basic shapes and the shading. Not well made, but at least is recognizable.

the picture of a bow and arrow

I am a fan of the Arrowverse show and this was the time when I was rewatching the first season of Arrow. So you can guess, where the insperation came from.

the picture of arrows

This is another one, that comes from the same source of insperation than the prebious one.

the picture of murder

I am also a bit of fan of the criminal stories (though I currentlly don't have the time to watch/read them). I think one of the reason is, that the detective stories normally have intelligent people in them, and I like reading about them. So, here you can imagine that the murder happened (along with the pool of blood), but the body is not seen, since I don't know how to draw people yet.

the picture of a chair

Another picture of the chair, which I am pretty sure is the same chair that I had already drawn before.

the picture of one of the street in Bratislava

Here, I tried to see my current level of drawning the city. This was made from memory. It was supposed to be one of the streets in Bratislava.

My Drawing Lessons 2019-01-08

This time we started a bit more with learning perspective. We did that by learning to draw a chair. After I finished the chair, I also tired to add some other things. Well, you can see the result below.

drawing of a chair

Different Types of Personality Tests

Normally personality tests are designed in a way, to test you on a couple of different traits and tell you, how well developed is this trait. This is the type that is usually done by The Big Five and other types of surveys, that come from the sciences, MBTI, humors, and so on and so on. This one is really useful to show, how we compare to other people.

On the other hand is the type, where they end up ranking the relative strength of traits in the person. I think Rogers had this type and also the Jung had this type. This one is more useful to realize what are our strengths and weakness. When not comparing to other people. And even more important, it tells us how we approach the world.

I have to admit, that when it comes to my personal development, I usually pick the second type of test. But when it comes to making decisions that involves other people, I am much more adherent to the first one.

So then I found on Youtube (which is the ban of my existence) a video, which transformed The Big Five from the first type into the second one. Here are the questions:

Question Extroversion Agreeableness Neuroticism Conscientiousness Openness
What word best describes you? Talkative Kind Anxious Efficient Imaginative
How would your best friend describe you? Enthusiastic Cooperative Worrisome Organized Creative
Pick the activity that sounds most like something you would do: Plan a party Donate to a charity Share a problem with a close friend Make a schedule for your week Create a piece of art
Which adage would you live by? Spend time with friends Care for people in need Safety first Do your duty Beauty will save the world
What's your biggest fault? Dominate conversations Let people take advantage Worry too much Perfectionist Scatterbrained
When faced with a problem, I tend to approach it... Energetically Cooperatively Nervously Dependably Curiously

So, when I am solving this test, I get the half split between conscientiousness and openness. Which I kind of agree with. I mean, the one weakness of this test is to not also take into account, that being on the very end of the other trait can also be helpful. Which I am, when it comes to extroversion and agreeableness. I did expect at least one answer from neuroticism, but I got 0 as well. For me it was a bit confirmation, that I sometimes also approach things like these hard-working people. :)

Then I also got interesting, and try to figure out, what some of the people would get. Since I should not write what I think about other people on the blog, I am going to use the example of the fictional characters. And since in the last half a year, I am into the Arrowverse, you can imagine which characters will I be using.

Person Extroversion Agreeableness Neuroticism Conscientiousness Openness Type
Oliver Queen 1 1 0 4 0 Conscientiousness
Tommy Merlin 6 0 0 0 0 Extroversion
John Diggle 0 2 1 3 0 Conscientiousness
Felicity Smoak 2 0 0 0 4 Openness
Barry Allen 0 5 1 0 0 Agreeableness
Cisco Ramon 3 0 0 0 3 Extroversion/Openness
Eobard Thawne 1 0 0 4 1 Conscientiousness
Caitlin Snow 0 2 3 1 0 Neuroticism

Well, if we compare the Arrow and Flash team in their first season (so Oliver, John and Felicity vs. Barry, Cisco, Caitlin and Eobard), we have a team mired in conscientiousness, balanced by openness. On the other side, we have all five of the traits expressed. I wonder if this is the reason, why these two teams feel so different? Which would again be the wrong use of this type of questionnaire (but it is fun to wonder, and I don't think anybody thinks in methodologically the right way all the time).

My Quick Drawnings 2019-01-02

Here are a couple of my quick drawnings, that I made listening to the recording of the Jordan B. Petterson speech, he made in Ljubljana.

the picture of a bottle

This is a picture, that I made from another picture, that I did during on of the lingustics lessons.

the picture of a house and trees

This is another picture, that I made based on the drawning from lingustics lecture. This is the view that can be seen from one of the classrooms at the Faculty of Arts.

the picture of a bookshelfs

This is how the corner of my room looks like. This is the corner, that is the most away from the conrner, where I am sitting, when I am no computer.

the picture of a chair

This is the chair, that I was looking at, when I am st lingustics. We also sit on chairs like this.

the picture of a picher

I drink a lot of tea, and at home I usually do it from this. I have it next to me right now as well.

The Summary of Year 2018

I think that by this time, the whole Earth had entered the year 2019. Happy new year to anybody reading it right now. For the beginning of new year, I though to write a short numerical summary of what I did in this year.

For this, I am only able to do the summary for the things, that I do the good job of keeping track of. So, that means, that the only things that I can describe is the use of my internet, the number of blog posts and the amount of material read.

Blog Posts

Let me start with the blog. I have recently changed the way how I show the blog posts here. I am using nikola now, which means, that if I wanted to keep the links the same as when I was using htmly, I needed to put the blog posts in the year/month folders. Which made the analysis a lot easier, since I only needed to count the number of files in the folders.

import os

post_folder = "/mnt/Stable/"

months = os.listdir(post_folder)

number_of_posts = dict()

for month in months:
    posts = os.listdir(post_folder + "/" + month)
    number_of_posts[int(month)] = len(posts)

with open("blog_posts.csv", "w") as f:
    all_posts = 0
    for i in range(1, 13):
        if i not in number_of_posts:
            post_number = 0
            post_number = number_of_posts[i]
        f.write(str(i) + ";" + str(post_number) + "\n")
        all_posts += post_number
    print("I had written " + str(all_posts) + " blog posts in year 2018.")

In the year 2018 I had written 58 blog posts. Here is the breakdown by the months:

Month Posts Written
January 2
February 0
March 3
April 1
May 6
June 3
July 2
August 7
September 7
October 9
November 11
December 7

For the more visual types, there is also an easy way to create a graph:


data <- read.csv("blog_posts.csv", sep=";", header=TRUE)

ggplot(data, aes(x=Month, y=PostNumber)) + 
    geom_line(color="blue") + 
    xlab("Months") + 
    ylab("Number of Posts Written") +
    ggtitle("Blogging in 2018")

graph of number of post written (data is on the table further up)

Reading Material

Ever since the later months of 2017, I have kept track of all the books, scientific articles and similar material (like thesis). I simply put them in the .bib file with the time stamp, which indicates, when I had finished the material. Which means, that for the year 2018, I have the information for every book that I finished and every scientific article that I had finished.

The script this time is a big longer, since i needed po parse the bib files as well:

import re

def get_bib_entries_by_date(list_of_files, date_to_match):
    re_entry = r"@\w*{.+?timestamp.+?}"
    re_timestamp = r"timestamp[\s]+?=[\s]+?{.+?}"
    re_date = r"\d\d\d\d-\d\d-\d\d"
    re_type = r"@\w*{"

    lines = ""

    for bib_file in list_of_files:
        with open(bib_file) as f:
            lines2 = f.readlines()

        lines2 = " ".join(lines2)
        lines = lines + lines2

    lines = lines.replace("\n", " ")

    lines = re.findall(re_entry, lines)
    all_entries = dict()

    for line in lines:
        timestamp = re.findall(re_timestamp, line)[0]
        date = re.findall(re_date, timestamp)
        if date:
            date = date[0]
        entry = re.findall(re_type, line)[0][1:-1]
        if date_to_match in date:
            if entry not in all_entries:
                all_entries[entry] = 0
            all_entries[entry] += 1

    return all_entries

def dictionary_to_csv(dictionary, filename):
    with open(filename, "w") as f:
        for month in dictionary:
            for entry in dictionary[month]:
                    month + ";" + entry + ";" + str(dictionary[month][entry]) + "\n"

def get_entries_by_months(filenames, year, filename):
    months = ["01", "02", "03", "04", "05", "06", "07", "08", "09", "10", "11", "12"]
    all_results = dict()
    for month in months:
        all_results[month] = get_bib_entries_by_date(filenames, year + "-" + month)
    dictionary_to_csv(all_results, filename)

    ["Articles.bib", "Books.bib", "Conferences.bib", "Predelano.bib", "Thesis.bib"],

This got me the csv file, that I could then analyse and visualize in R. This is the code that I had used:


data <- read.csv("2018.csv", sep=";", header=TRUE)

data_articles <- data %>% 
    filter(Entry=="Article" | Entry=="InProceedings") %>% 
    group_by(Month) %>% 
    summarize(Count=sum(Count), Entry="Article")
data_books <- data %>% 
    filter(Entry=="Book") %>% 
    group_by(Month) %>% 
    summarize(Count=sum(Count), Entry="Book")
data_chapters <- data %>% 
    filter(Entry=="InBook" | Entry=="InCollection") %>% 
    group_by(Month) %>% 
    summarize(Count=sum(Count), Entry="Chapter")
data_other <- data %>% 
    filter(Entry=="MasterThesis" | Entry=="Report" | Entry=="TechReport" | Entry=="Thesis") %>% 
    group_by(Month) %>% 
    summarize(Count=sum(Count), Entry="Other")

ggplot(data_articles, aes(x=Month, y=Count)) + 
    geom_line(color="blue") + 
    xlab("Months") + 
    ylab("Number of Articles Read") +
    ggtitle("Reading Articles in 2018")

ggplot(data_books, aes(x=Month, y=Count)) + 
    geom_line(color="blue") + 
    xlab("Months") + 
    ylab("Number of Books Read") +
    ggtitle("Reading Books in 2018")

data <-, data_books, all=TRUE)
data <-, data_chapters, all=TRUE)
data <-, data_other, all=TRUE)

data_summary <- data %>% group_by(Entry) %>% summarize(Count=sum(Count), MonthAvg=sum(Count)/12, DayAvg=sum(Count)/365)


So now for the results. In the following table, there are the results for the number of material that I read:

Type Units Read Month Average Day Average
Articles 530 44.2 1.45
Books 102 8.5 0.279
Chapters 39 3.25 0.107
Other 14 1.17 0.0384

In the personal development, they suggest to read 50 book per year. It was supposed to be good for something? I am not sure. Well, I read about twice as much without this being the goal, so I think this was quite nice.

But I was more interested in how many articles do I read per day. So I read about 1.5 article per day. This seems like a relatively small number, but this would be the number, if I was consistent in doing it every day. Which I am not. So I guess I should be happy with the result. I mean, I read more than 500 of them in a year, which is not a small number.

For people, that are more visual, I also added the graphs of how many books and articles did I read per month.

This is the graph for the articles:

graph of number of articles read in 2018

And another graph for books:

graph of number of books read in 2018

Time Spend on the Internet

While not for for all months, I do have data for my use of internet form July to October. So here I am going to show you some of this as well. Let us first start with the parsing, before we go to the visualization:

folder = "Programming-MyUsedTime"
files = [

time_spend_on_websites = dict()

for filename in files:
    with open(folder + "/" + filename) as f:
        lines = f.readlines()
    for line in lines:
        line = line.strip()
        _, website, time, _, _ = line.split(";")
        if not website:
        if website not in time_spend_on_websites:
            time_spend_on_websites[website] = 0
        time = time.split(":")
        if len(time) == 3:
            time = int(time[0]) * 60 * 60 + int(time[1]) * 60 + int(time[0])
        elif len(time) == 2:
            time = int(time[0]) * 60 + int(time[1])
        time_spend_on_websites[website] += time

with open("Websites-2018.csv", "w") as f:
    for website, time in time_spend_on_websites.items():
        if time > 0:
            f.write(website + ";" + str(time) + "\n")

So, for the first analysis, lets see how many hours did I spend on the internet per month. I do apologize, that the names of the months are in Slovenian. But the sames are similar, so it should not impend the understanding too much.


data_total <- read.csv("Programming-MyUsedTime/MindTheTime-2018-Total.csv", sep=";", header=FALSE)
names(data_total) <- c("Month", "Time", "Nothing")
data_total$Nothing <- NULL

data_total <- data_total %>%
    separate(col=Time, into=c("Hours", "Minutes", "Seconds"), sep=":") 

data_total$Hours <- as.numeric(data_total$Hours)
data_total$Minutes <- as.numeric(data_total$Minutes)
data_total$Seconds <- as.numeric(data_total$Seconds)

data_total$Time = data_total$Hours * 60 * 60 + data_total$Minutes * 60 + data_total$Seconds

ggplot(data_total, aes(x=Month, y=Hours)) + 
    geom_col(color="blue") + 
    scale_x_discrete(limits=c("Junij", "Julij", "August", "September", "Oktober")) +
    xlab("Months") + 
    ylab("Time Spend on Internet") +
    ggtitle("Time Spend on Internet in 2018")

time spend on the internet in hours per month (June: 72, July: 119, August: 140, September: 110, October: 62)

Well, now I could also check the most visited 10 domains in this time frame. I am going to do it, simply because when I saw it for the first time a couple of months ago, I started to change some of my habits. So, let us see these pages:


data <- read.csv("Websites-2018.csv", sep=";", header=TRUE)
data <- data[with(data, order(Time, decreasing=TRUE)), ]
data10 <- head(data, n=10)

data10$Minutes <- data10$Time %/% 60
data10$Seconds <- data10$Time %% 60
data10$Hours <- data10$Minutes %/% 60
data10$Minutes <- data10$Minutes %% 60
data10$Time <- NULL

Website Hours Minutes Seconds 98 55 9 45 39 55 1 5 49 0 20 21 0 12 4 0 9 50 0 9 8 0 8 32 0 7 36 0 7 14

This can be grouped into a couple of categories: fanfiction (,, watching (illegal) videos (,,,,, email (, search ( and language learning ( Sure puts things in the perspective in how I spend time on the internet.

Well, since this time, I have blocked the sites containing fanfiction. I also decided to stop watching series illegally on the internet, but instead by DVDs. I am expecting three more season DVDs this week. Also, since I buy European DVDs, they always have some foreign language track there as well. It is a lot more interesting watching series in German than doing the German Duolingo tree. I now use mutt as email, so it will not longer log there. Also, when I use mutt it feels faster than when I was using gmail through browser. Not much I can do about search yet. I need to find some way there as well.

So I am assuming that the data for year 2019 is going to look a lot different.

So this was my year 2018 in some numerical numbers.

I updated the blog

If you had been on my blog previously, you can see that my blog now looks different. I used to use htmly, but now I am generating a static site with nikola and then just serve the html files generated. It is not that I was unsatisfied with the htmly, it is just that I could not figure out, how to update my site without having to log in every time. Because login requires cookies (only session cookie) and they needed to be set for everybody and so on and I tried to make it work for my case.

Actually, my site still sets a session cookie ("PH_HPXY_CHECK") for some reason, but I no longer have any code, which would set it. I don't get this cookie, when I am running a site on my own computer. I have no idea, how to eliminate this one as well.

The other thing was, that it required tag for every single blogs. I do have tags for some of my work (mostly my material that I had originally posted on other websites), but not for most of them. I guess these were the two things, that I wanted to deal with. I would still recommend htmly as a simple blog platform, it just was not for me.

Then I read on the internet a bit about the static sites generators. I don't have any kind of interaction on my site. Even if in the future I realize that I needed the interaction, I still think that most of the sites will be static. So this works well.

I have spend around a day (if measured as time frame of 24 hours) putting everything in the new system and changing the css a bit. This is why some details may not be that well made yet. But I like, that this made the page size smaller for around 60%, which is always a good think. To take care of the environment (and make pages faster, but this version is no faster than the previous one).

On the other hand, I am currently working on the app for researching experience. And I am at the user experience part of it. And I realized that I had no idea, how a good user experience no mobile app looks like (since I don't really use my phone and tablet enough to get a feeling). On the other side, I do know what user experience do I like at websites, so this is like having a practice before the real part.

Hope this will make the blog more and not less readable.

If anybody came here searching for how to migrate from htmly to nikola, I appologize that I am not writting about it. But I will add the code that I used to change the htmly blogposts to nikola blog posts.

import os
import re

re_title = r"<!--t[\S\s]*t-->"
re_tag = r"<!--tag[\S\s]*tag-->"
re_desc = r"<!--d[\S\s]*d-->"

all_files = os.listdir("post/")

for current_file in all_files:
    time = ":".join(current_file.split("_")[0].split("-")[3:])
    date = "-".join(current_file.split("_")[0].split("-")[:3])
    datetime = date + " " + time + " UTC"
    filename = current_file.split("_")[2][:-3]
    tags = current_file.split("_")[1]
    if tags == "none":
        tags = ""
    with open(os.path.join("post/", current_file)) as f:
        lines = f.readlines()
    lines = "".join(lines)
    title =, lines).group(0)
    lines = lines.replace(title, "")
    title = title.replace("<!--t", "").replace("t-->", "").strip()
    lines = lines.replace(, lines).group(0), "")
    desc =, lines).group(0)
    lines = lines.replace(desc, "")
    desc = desc.replace("<!--d", "").replace("d-->", "").strip()
    with open(os.path.join("trypost2/", filename + ".rst"), "w") as f:
        f.write(".. title: " + title + "\n")
        f.write(".. slug: " + filename + "\n")
        f.write(".. date: " + datetime + "\n")
        f.write(".. tags: " + tags + "\n")
        f.write(".. description: " + desc + "\n")

You can also donwload the code here:

Using Mutt to Read Emails

I am going to admit, that I have been interested in the idea of minimalism for years. Getting rid of the things that are unnecessary and make sure that what is left is what I enjoy having and doing. I am still far away of the ideal, but it is there. Now I am going to just elsewhere, but I will come to this point later.

I have been spending a bit of time on trying to speed up my internet site in the last two months. I wanted to make sure than my banwidth is as small as possible for enviormental reasons and my loading time is as small as possible for respect of the time that people have. I am still very far away from it.

But there was one thing that I noticed. Quite a lot of websites were hell of a lot slower than my website. And one of them was also gmail, which I had been using so far to check my email. Which means, that every time I checked emails, I had to wait a couple of seconds (not that I ever timed it). Plus, I am more and more uncomfortable with how personal data is used, so I always knew that eventually I will close it anyway. So this was a good excuse for me to try something new and to make sure that I am making a step into getting away from the giant internet companies.

What I decided to try was mutt. This is a command line program, that allows me to read my emails and to recive them. I also had to get msmtp to send my messages. I head about mutt from one of my professors, when I was abroad. I found the idea of checking the email in the command line interesting. But up until now, I had never tried it. I found out about msmpt from the helpful guide about using mutt on ubuntu. They also recomend some other packages (like fetchmail), but I found out that I don't need them.

I did spend a lot of time trying to track down, how the configuration files should look like, so I will share mine, in case they help somebody. First here is the configuration file for mutt (.muttrc):

set realname = "Sara Jakša"
set from = "Sara Jakša <[email address]>"

set folder = [imap url:port]
set imap_user = [email username]
set imap_pass = [email password]

unset imap_passive
set imap_keepalive = 300
set mail_check = 120

set spoolfile = "+INBOX"
set postponed ="+Drafts"
mailboxes = +INBOX

set sendmail="/usr/bin/msmtp"

set header_cache = ~/.cache/mutt
set message_cachedir = "~/.cache/mutt"

And a configuration file for msmtp (.msmtprc)

account default              
host [smtp url]      
port [smtp port]                     
from [email]  
tls on                       
tls_starttls off              
tls_trust_file /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt
auth on                     
user [email username]    
password [email password]
logfile ~/.msmtp.log

Though I would recomend, that you follow the guide that I linked above, as the person writting it probablly have a lot more knowledge about it than somebody that started learing about it less than 24 hours ago.

Now let me return to the point about the minimalism, that I started before. I always liked the command line, because it forced me to be minimalistic about it. There are no colors to distract my, neither are there any advertizments. It helps, that I am not checking my emails in the browser, because that means, that if I am not learning a new programming something, I can just eliminate the browser from my linux instalation. Also, I am still not sure how to do different setttings, but it seems that once I delete a message from mutt, it is also gone from the server. Which also helps with being more mindful about it, but also with being able to forget about it, once the message it deleted.

I think the point of the minimalism is also to find the tools that help one do the work, that needs to be done, without distracting us. And mutt, not being a browser, already has the advantage of not being able to simply switch to blogs or youtube (or the current addiction that I am fighting for the last couple of months: fanfiction). Plus, it is not anoying and slow, like some of the other clients, like Thunderbird. I think I finally found something, that will only improve my life.

What are similarity in Windows vs. Linux and Social Media vs. Blog

I am right now programming a mobile app for researching ones experience, so I am getting more and more into the sphere of Android and iOS and react-native. The people I worked with asked me, if I wanted my own Mac computer. I have to admit, if one is satified with not having every functionality, then one does not need a mac. I know that the first demo version just worked on the mac. But there are still things, that are hard (or impossible) to do without it - like notifications.

But when I got the questions about getting a Mac, I was thinking about my own workflow. I have right now both Windows and Arch Linux installed on my system. But I can clearly see, which one do I prefer. When I had a research project during my cognitive science studied, we were using Atlas.ti for analyzing data. Well, installing Atlas.ti on Linux was imposisble for me (believe me, I tried), so every time I wanted to continioue the analysis, I needed to log into Windows. And that was a battle. Every. Single. Time. There was something about it, that I really did not like it.

I took note of it as one of my twerks at the time, and I did not go any further into it. Until very recentlly, when I realized that I got a very similar feeling. The topic of that feeling. Surprisingly my tablet. And here I was more aware, of where was this feeling comming from. And this is from the complete frustration of not making the tech work the way I wanted it to. Ofcourse, the newest version of Android for my tablet was one below the minimal one needed for react-native. And ofcourse, installing the newer version of Android does not have any clear instructions. And ofcourse, the most frequent thing, that come up when searching for the solution was the possibility of making a brick out of the tech. I mean, it is just a piece of tech, I can't be the only one who wanted to to this?! Is that what people talk about when they talk about planned obselency?!

As somebody that has been having Linux as my primary operating system and somebody that was never a big user of smartphones and tablets, I found this frustrating. To me it is obious, that it is the user that controls the system, and not the system that forces user to comform to it. I am the one that decides what is not my system (something that Windows and Android don't really agree with), I decide when things get upgrated (ditto) and I decide when do I use what. If I don't like something, I can change each single part of the system in the way that I wanted. If I don't have the skills, then I can learn or pay somebody else to do it.

But maybe these things are not that obious to other people. On the last python meetup, I was speaking with a firend, and she mentioned that somebody she knows was thinking about changing the operating system. And the videos explaning how to do it were using the command line. That convined them (I think it was a he, but I am not sure, so them) to no use it. And they were looking things for Ubuntu, where most things that a normal computer user would want to do, can be done through graphical interface.

Maybe this is why we end up with stories like this. Where the technology is starting to make the job of the doctors harder. It is interesting, that they are solving it by hiring a sort of a secretary.

Sure, then I came accross the Free Software Fundation which also touch upon some of these same points, that annoy me (you can read their story The Right to Read, it is great).

But beside this, that also reminded me of what I have listened in a youtube video or two from Tristan Harris. He talks about how social media (and possible other things as well, my memory may be a bit lacking) are designed in a way to addict us. He goes into how this is tied into how the value of these companies is calculated and their monitizing model, but this is not important for my argument. Is seems that social media, with all their design restrictions and the way they are controlled, and even social expectations in place, they are the same type of system like Android and Windows.

What is the more Linux like system? Blogging. I am not the first one, that has noticed that. There are recent articles from Cal Newport, that touch upon that. One example is comparing social media to AOL or how social media compare to blogs. Everybody can start the blog (or their website). They can put anything they want on there. It can look in anyway it can (which profiles on social media can not). Nobody has the right to delete your content (which can happen with social media). Nobody can stop you from being there (which is true for social media). The book Technically Wrong has a couple of good examples about it. (Is it bad, that when I say the writting of the book on the site - "Recommended for all readers interested in the intersection of technology and social justice" - I was thinking of deleting this sentence?)

Maybe that is why, I also get frustrated by the social media all the time, but in the years of writting this blog, I had not once become frustrated about it? I originally thought this is because using social media is a social situation (with all social expectations), but writting for this blog is something I do for myself. But maybe this is another possible explanation. I get frustrated not because of the socialiness of the situation, but because of the loss of control? I guess this would be the best description.

Tis weekend, when I went hiking with a friend, he asked me, why I no longer have a LinkedIn account. And I told him, that I had no positive results from it. He gave me a couple of reasons, why this was so. Better economy, I am soon not going to be a student anymore. I started working. And so on. And then I mentioned that we both know at least two people, that if I told them, that I need a job in a next couple of months, I would get it, without me needing to do anything else.

Is there any social media, that can say that? I would guess not. Instead, I can simply eliminate another source of frustration from my life.